Individual Study / Gandrud et al.; Pediatr Diabetes. 2018

Intensive Remote Monitoring Versus Conventional Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Intensive Remote Monitoring Versus Conventional Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Initiatives -
This study was conducted to assess the impact of an intensive remote therapy (IRT) intervention for pediatric patients with T1D. Note: All published information has been collected from the article referenced in the Marker Paper box below. Therefore, there may be variations with more advanced versions of the study.
Start Year
2015
End Year
2016

Design

Study design
Clinical trial cohort

Marker Paper

Gandrud L, Altan A, Buzinec P, et al. Intensive remote monitoring versus conventional care in type 1 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial [published online ahead of print, 2018 Feb 21]. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;10.1111/pedi.12654. doi:10.1111/pedi.12654

PUBMED 29464831

Number of participants

Number of participants
117
Number of participants with biosamples

Access

Availability of data and biosamples

Data
Biosamples
Other

Timeline

Population

This was a parallel‐group randomized controlled trial of children and adolescents with T1D recruited from September 14, 2015 to March 3, 2016 from among patients who had been seen in the McNeely Pediatric Diabetes Center at Children's Minnesota (St. Paul, Minnesota) within the past 6 months.
Selection Criteria
Minimum age
8
Maximum age
17
Newborns
Twins
Countries
  • United States of America
Ethnic Origin
Health Status
  • Pediatric patients with T1D

Recruitment

Sources of recruitment
  • Clinical patients

Number of participants

Number of participants
117
Number of participants with biosamples
Data Collection Event
This study was conducted to assess the impact of an intensive remote therapy (IRT) intervention for pediatric patients with T1D.
Start Date
2015-09
End Date
2016-03
Data sources
  • Mobile data collection
    • Mobile phone
    • Smartphone
    • remote sensing, smart sensors